Skip to Main Content

Generative AI and ChatGPT

When and What to Cite from Generative AI

While some citation and referencing styles have published interim direction on how AI generated materials should be cited, many still do not have specific guidelines. In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, and follow guidelines for how to cite those resource types with your chosen reference style.

Below are some suggestions on citing generative AI materials in some of the major citation styles. Please note that UBC Library has a more comprehensive guide on how (and when) to cite other resources here. As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use. 

Citing AI Generated Materials

In a series of posts from September 9, 2025, the APA Style Blog has updated its previous guidelines on citing Generative AI.

Reference formats

For more details, please see:
McAdoo, T., Denneny, S. & Lee, C. (2025, September 9). Citing generative AI in APA Style: Part 1—Reference formats. APA Style Blog. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references

APA suggests that you should cite specific chats when they are used to generate ideas, content and information. You should cite the tool generally for the following use cases:

  • when editing or organizing your own writing. Be sure to disclose in the author note or method section that you used GenAI to help prepare the paper, and cite the tool you used;
  • for translation, either for part of a source or of your own work into another language. You should disclose that you have used GenAI for this task and cite the tool generally;
  • when creating code, tables, or figures;
  • for methodology.

Please note that it's a best practice to document your prompts for reference. It's not necessary to cite each one, but you should keep them handy as sources of data. You can also put the full text of long responses in an appendix or online supplemental materials.

APA also suggests that, given that AI-generated content like chats are not created by a person, they cannot be considered personal communication. Instead, treat the content as an algorithm's output, and credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and in-text citation.

Please use the following templates when citing GenAI. Please note that the author is the name of the AI company, not the tool being used.

Reference List

General citation:

AI company name. (Year). Tool Name/Model in Italics and Title Case. [Desciption, e.g. Large language model]. URL of the tool


Example:

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (GPT-5) [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com/

Citation for a specific chat:

AI company name. (Year, month day). Title of chat in italics [Description, e.g. Generative AI chat]. Tool name/model. URL of chat
 
In-Text Citation

For a direct quote or paraphrase, or to cite the tool, use the following format:

(AI company name, year)


Example:

Parenthetical citation: (OpenAI, 2025)

Narrative citation: OpenAI (2025)

AI as search engine

For more information, please see:

McAdoo, T., Denneny, S. & Lee, C. (2025, September 9). Citing generative AI in APA Style: Part 2—AI as a search engine and AI integrated into common software. APA Style Blog. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-search-software

In general, you do not need to cite AI if you're using it as a search engine, but do make sure that the AI tool cites its sources! Always verify the sources of information that the AI tool gives you.

Do not cite AI that is integrated into software (e.g. Copilot within Microsoft Word; this is seen as a similar use case to spellcheck).

Exception: If you are using GenAI in literature reviews, meta-analyses or metasyntheses, include your search strategy and state that AI was used to search for resources. Name the tools used, and cite as above.

Is AI "allowed" in APA style?

For more information, please see:

McAdoo, T., Denneny, S. & Lee, C. (2025, September 9).Citing generative AI in APA Style: Part 3—Is AI “allowed” in APA Style?. APA Style Blog. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-allowed

Please note that there are no hard and fast rules on permission or prohibition of the use of GenAI in academic or scholarly writing. The best practice is to check the guidelines involved, whether it's an essay for class or an article for publication in a journal. Always confirm with your instructor or check your syllabus for their explicit direction on the use of AI in their class. Remember that GenAI is not an author, and is not accountable for outputs; human authors, however, bear full responsibility for the accuracy or bias in the content of any text or data produced by GenAI.

As of March 17, 2023, MLA has provided some guidance on citing generative AI, including ChatGPT and DALL-E.

In summary, MLA recommends

  • citing a generative AI tool whenever you incorporate any content created by it into your own work
  • acknowledging any uses of the tool in a note or other suitable location
  • vetting any secondary sources it cites
  • not treating the AI tool as an author

 

Works Cited Entry

The works cited entry for AI generated material should follow this format:

"Description of chat" prompt. Name of AI tool, version of AI tool, Company, Date of chat, URL.

Example:

"Write a haiku in the style of Edgar Allen Poe" prompt. ChatGPT, May 3 version, OpenAI, 19 June 2023, chat.openai.com/chat

 

In-Text Citation

For any quotes, paraphrases or references to the AI generated material, use the following format:

("Shortened description of chat")

Example:

("Write a haiku")

The 18th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style indicates that authors must be transparent about how the tool has been used either in the text, in a preface, or the like (see section 14.112). Any specific content should be cited though the text or in a footnote, regardless of if it's directly quoted or paraphrased.

For chats that are unrecoverable (i.e., you can't link to the chat), Chicago recommends treating these chats like personal communication, which doesn't require an entry in your bibliography or reference list. However, these references do still need to be cited in-text for Author-Date or in the footnote for Footnote version.

Many GenAI chats allow you to share URLs to archived chats. These chats can be cited like recoverable webpages in your reference list in addition to in-text. If you're including a reference list entry, cite it under the name of the publisher or developer (ex. OpenAI or Microsoft) rather than the name of the tool (ex. ChatGPT-4 or Copilot).

 
Bibliography or Reference List (for recoverable chats)

OpenAI. Response to “How many copyeditors does it take to fix a book-length manuscript?” ChatGPT-4, February 10, 2024. https://chatgpt.com/share/66fb0ff3-7280-8009-93a9-d956f412390b.

 
Footnote Version
Note number. Description of the communication, name of the AI tool, publisher of the tool, date the text was generated, URL.

Example:

1. Text generated by ChatGPT-3.5, OpenAI, December 9, 2023, https://chat.openai.com/share/90b8137d-ff1c-4c0c-b123-2868623c4ae2.

A prompt, if not included in the text, may be added to the note. Longer prompts or chat may be summarized.

2. Response to “Explain how to make pizza dough from common household ingredients,” ChatGPT-3.5, Open AI, December 9, 2023, edited for style and accuracy.

Author-Date Version

In an author-date version, treat the name of the tool as the author of the content.

Example:

The following recipe for pizza dough was generated on December 9, 2023, by ChatGPT-3.5.

Although there is no specific guidance offered by Vancouver Style editors, AI content is generally considered personal communication and/or non-recoverable data, and therefore should not be included as a reference in your reference list according to the Vancouver Style.

 
Reference List

Do not include.

 
In-Text Citation

AI-generated content can be cited in-text using the following format:

Type of Communication, Communicator, Date (DMY)

You can also include further information, such as the prompt you offered the AI in type of communication.

Examples:

In an online chat with Open AI's Chat GPT (23 March 2023)...

A chat generated a potentially useful script for dealing with these interactions (ChatGPT response, prompt for "How to resolve conflict with a coworker", 24 March 2023).

...(Grammerly paraphrase, 22 February 2023).

As of June 2023, IEEE does not cite AI generated text for publication and does not consider AI generated text a valid reference.

However, overall current advice is to treat AI generated text as a private communication or nonrecoverable material. Therefore, do not include a citation number, or include the reference in your reference list.

 

Reference List

Do not include a reference list entry.

 

In-text Citation

IEEE uses the following in-text citation format for unpublished materials:

Author's name (Initials, Surname), private communication, Abbrev. Month, year.)

Example:

In an online chat,... (OpenAI's Chat GPT, private communication, June 2023)

The Canadian Open Access Legal Citation Guide (the COAL Citation Guide) is designed to meet the needs of Canadian legal writers and researches. The full guide is freely available online. Section 8, AI-Generated Material, gives a detailed description of how to cite GenAI content. The general format is shown below. 

Reference List

Name of AI, version if available. Prompt. (Translation of prompt if applicable.) (Developer: host if different than developer, date or date range of response). URL if conversation publicly saved (Description of any additional prompts.) 

Full descriptions of each citation component are available in section 8.4 of the COAL Citation Guide. 

Shortened Citations

To be used in subsequent citations once the full citation has been provided. The COAL Citation Guide recommends using the name of the AI for the shortened citation. 

As each shortened citation must be unique, additional information (such as an abbreviated version of the initial prompt) must be added to differentiate shortened citations from others which use the same AI. 

Example (From COAL Citation Guide: Section 8.5):

  • First reference: ChatGPT, 3.5. Response to “when can landlords evict tenants?” (OpenAI, 25 March 2024). (Further prompts to specify jurisdiction and type of tenancy.) [ChatGPT].
Subsequent references: ChatGPT.

If the AI is not publicly available: 

Where the AI is not publicly available, the COAL Citation Guide recommends including additional information where possible. 

General Format: 

Name of AI, version if available. Prompt. (Translation of prompt if applicable.) (Developer: host if different than developer, date or date range of response). Description of type of nonpublic (name and version of public upstream version if applicable: developer of public upstream version if applicable, whether updated by public upstream version if applicable). URL if conversation publicly saved (Description of any additional prompts.) 

As with textual outputs, it is important to acknowledge how you have used generative AI in creating non-textual outputs such as images, music, figures, etc.

As of June 2023, only MLA and Chicago have released some guidelines on how to cite visual and other works generated by AI. See the links below for more information on citing images and other non-textual materials generated by AI, as well as guides created by UBC Library on citing non-textual materials generally.

AIs and Authorship

As of June 2023, several publishers have offered guidance on how AI tools should be considered for publications

  • Cambridge University Press states that AI must be declared and clearly explained, and does not meet the requirements for authorship in terms of accountability (Link to Cambridge Authorship and Contributorship Guidelines)
  • Taylor & Francis states that AI tools cannot be listed as an author, and their use must be acknowledge and documented appropriately (Link to Taylor and Francis statement on responsible use of AI)
  • Nature and other Springer Journals advise that Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT will not be accepted as credited authors on research papers. However, researchers using LLM tools should document their use in the methods or acknowledgement section (Link to Nature statement on use of AI)
  • Science has created an Artificial Intelligence (AI) policy which states: “Text generated from AI, machine learning, or similar algorithmic tools cannot be used in papers published in Science journals, nor can the accompanying figures, images, or graphics be the products of such tools, without explicit permission from the editors. In addition, an AI program cannot be an author of a Science journal paper. A violation of this policy constitutes scientific misconduct.” (Link to Science statement)

Technical Standards

The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity is developing an open technical standard for greater transparency in how media or documents have been altered. The MIT Technology Review has described this as a "nutritional label" for AI.