It is important to understand the author’s background, which informs their perspective and their authority on the subject. Your review should include a brief section on the author’s credentials and previous work. To find this, you may look at:
You should also understand the subject the author is writing in, including the current state of knowledge, generally accepted paradigms, and requirements of writing in the genre. Your course readings and educational background will likely prepare you for this. Knowing the subject helps you determine what the book’s unique contribution to the subject is, which parts are generally accepted or controversial, and whether the author is accepting or challenging the current state of affairs.
Writing a book review requires close reading. Read with a critical eye, but don’t be overly harsh. Read the book the author wrote, not the one you wish they wrote: this means evaluating whether the book meets the author’s own goals and adequately proves the thesis.
First, you should determine the author’s purpose, their thesis, and the scope of the book. The title, preface and introduction should offer a sense of all three. The author may also give explicit information about their theoretical assumptions and the state of the topic about which they are writing.
Read the table of contents for information about the main points dealt with in each chapter and the overall structure of the book. Is it divided chronologically, by topic, or in some other way?
As you read, keep detailed, chapter-by-chapter notes. Summarize the author’s argument and write down quotes you will use in your review. Also, write down your reactions and critiques, keeping them clearly separated from the author’s ideas.
As you read, think about:
In additions to the main contents of the book, consider the bibliography—this is a good measure of the type and number of sources used—and any understanding aids like visual information like charts and graphs, indexes, etc. Are these effective? Are they accurate? Are they presented in a way that could lead to false conclusions?